McKnight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKnight v. State

492 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1718, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2312

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 492 So. 2d 450 (McKnight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKnight v. State, 492 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1718, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery pursuant to section 784.045(1) Florida Statutes (1984). Although only a single blow was struck, the medical witness concluded that the punch resulted in extremely serious brain injury to the seventy year old victim.

Whether the evidence, in any given case, rises to the level of great bodily harm required by the statute is generally a question for the jury. Guthrie v. State, 407 So.2d 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Owens v. State, 289 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). We agree with those two cases. The extent and nature of a victim’s injuries vary according to the circumstances peculiar to each situation, such as the amount of force used or the manner of attack. In some cases the extent of injury may not be immediately apparent. Thus, the term “great bodily harm” does not lend itself to precise legal definition. People v. Smith, 6 Ill.App.3d 259, 285 N.E.2d 460 (Ill.App.Ct 1972).

Here there was substantial competent evidence to support the determination that the defendant acted with the requisite intent and that his blow resulted in great bodily harm. We therefore affirm. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982).

WALDEN and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery pursuant to section 784.045(1) Florida Statutes (1984). Although only a single blow was struck, the medical witness concluded that the punch resulted in extremely serious brain injury to the seventy year old victim.

Whether the evidence, in any given case, rises to the level of great bodily harm required by the statute is generally a question for the jury. Guthrie v. State, 407 So.2d 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Owens v. State, 289 So.2d 472 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). We agree with those two cases. The extent and nature of a victim’s injuries vary according to the circumstances peculiar to each situation, such as the amount of force used or the manner of attack. In some cases the extent of injury may not be immediately apparent. Thus, the term “great bodily harm” does not lend itself to precise legal definition. People v. Smith, 6 Ill.App.3d 259, 285 N.E.2d 460 (Ill.App.Ct 1972).

Here there was substantial competent evidence to support the determination that the defendant acted with the requisite intent and that his blow resulted in great bodily harm. We therefore affirm. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982).

WALDEN and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 So. 2d 450, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1718, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcknight-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack