C.M. v. State
519 So. 2d 1098, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 385, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1988 WL 8113
Opinion
The state presented substantial competent evidence to establish elements of aiding and abetting an aggravated battery, including evidence that the defendant acted with the requisite intent and that his acts resulted in great bodily harm. See McKnight v. State, 492 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 289 So.2d 472 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Appellant’s additional points do not demonstrate reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C.M. v. State, 519 So. 2d 1098, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 385, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1988 WL 8113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
519 So. 2d 1098 (C.M. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Owens v. State
289 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
McKnight v. State
492 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)