C.M. v. State
This text of 519 So. 2d 1098 (C.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state presented substantial competent evidence to establish elements of aiding and abetting an aggravated battery, including evidence that the defendant acted with the requisite intent and that his acts resulted in great bodily harm. See McKnight v. State, 492 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 289 So.2d 472 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Appellant’s additional points do not demonstrate reversible error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 So. 2d 1098, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 385, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1988 WL 8113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cm-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.