Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McKinnon v. Pelt

McKinnon v. Pelt

182 So. 3d 924, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 591, 2016 WL 166775
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-1413
StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 924 (McKinnon v. Pelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinnon v. Pelt, 182 So. 3d 924, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 591, 2016 WL 166775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying Appellant’s motion to dissolve the injunction, without prejudice to the appellant’s ability to file a subsequent motion asserting the requisite changed circumstances and seeking a hearing thereon. See Reyes v. Reyes, 104 So.3d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Alkhoury v. Alkhoury, 54 So.3d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Knight v. Waters, 786 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

BENTON, LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alkhoury v. Alkhoury
54 So. 3d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Reyes v. Reyes
104 So. 3d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Knight v. Waters
786 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 924, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 591, 2016 WL 166775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinnon-v-pelt-fladistctapp-2016.