Knight v. Waters
786 So. 2d 1289, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770, 2001 WL 708735
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2001·No. No. 1D00-3708·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
We affirm the appealed order because the appellant’s section 784.046(7)(e), Florida Statutes, motion to modify or dissolve the injunction in this case did not assert changed circumstances which would warrant relief. This does not preclude the appellant from filing a motion asserting such changed circumstances, and seeking a hearing thereon.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770, 2001 WL 708735 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
786 So. 2d 1289 (Knight v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinnon v. Pelt
182 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Thaddeus M. McKinnon v. Michelle Lee Pelt (McKinnon)
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Reyes v. Reyes
104 So. 3d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Alkhoury v. Alkhoury
54 So. 3d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Colarusso v. Lupetin
28 So. 3d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)