Knight v. Waters

786 So. 2d 1289, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770, 2001 WL 708735
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-3708
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 786 So. 2d 1289 (Knight v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knight v. Waters, 786 So. 2d 1289, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770, 2001 WL 708735 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appealed order because the appellant’s section 784.046(7)(e), Florida Statutes, motion to modify or dissolve the injunction in this case did not assert changed circumstances which would warrant relief. This does not preclude the appellant from filing a motion asserting such changed circumstances, and seeking a hearing thereon.

ALLEN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKinnon v. Pelt
182 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Thaddeus M. McKinnon v. Michelle Lee Pelt (McKinnon)
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016
Reyes v. Reyes
104 So. 3d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Alkhoury v. Alkhoury
54 So. 3d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Colarusso v. Lupetin
28 So. 3d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 So. 2d 1289, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8770, 2001 WL 708735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-waters-fladistctapp-2001.