McKinnie v. Tennessee

380 U.S. 449, 85 S. Ct. 1101, 14 L. Ed. 2d 151, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1487
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 5, 1965·No. 148·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. Hamm v. City of Rock Hill and Lupper v. Arkansas, 379 U. S. 306.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration in the light of supervening federal legislation, in accordance with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 326.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Hamm v. City of Rock Hill, 379 U. S. 306, 318, 322, 327.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinnie v. Tennessee, 380 U.S. 449, 85 S. Ct. 1101, 14 L. Ed. 2d 151, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1487 (1965).

380 U.S. 449 (McKinnie v. Tennessee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drews v. Maryland
381 U.S. 421 (Supreme Court, 1965)