McKinney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McKinney v. State

353 S.W.3d 450, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1593, 2011 WL 5942222

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKinney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 526 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2011·No. ED 96279·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnny L. McKinney, Sr., appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the *451 motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Johnny L. McKinney, Sr., appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the *451 motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

McKinney v. State, 353 S.W.3d 450, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1593, 2011 WL 5942222 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

353 S.W.3d 450 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.