McKinney v. State
308 S.W.3d 330, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2010 WL 1655860
Opinion
ORDER
Erma McKinney appeals from the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKinney v. State, 308 S.W.3d 330, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2010 WL 1655860 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
308 S.W.3d 330 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HAIDUSEK v. Division of Employment Security
308 S.W.3d 330 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)