McKibbin v. Peters
40 A. 288, 185 Pa. 518, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 745
Opinion
Wc find no error in the learned trial judge’s findings of fact or in his conclusions of law. The questions involved have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by him that nothing can be profitably added to what he has so well said. On his opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKibbin v. Peters, 40 A. 288, 185 Pa. 518, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 745 (Pa. 1898).
40 A. 288 (McKibbin v. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Psomas v. Approved Bancredit Corp.
40 Pa. D. & C.2d 51 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1965)
Shaeffer v. Baeringer
44 Pa. D. & C. 493 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1942)