McKeown v. Delaware Bridge Authority

23 F. App'x 81
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 21, 2001
DocketDocket No. 01-7487
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 23 F. App'x 81 (McKeown v. Delaware Bridge Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKeown v. Delaware Bridge Authority, 23 F. App'x 81 (2d Cir. 2001).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Pauley’s Memorandum and Order dated March 29, 2001.

We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F. App'x 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeown-v-delaware-bridge-authority-ca2-2001.