McKenzie v. Wardwell

61 Me. 136
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 Me. 136 (McKenzie v. Wardwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenzie v. Wardwell, 61 Me. 136 (Me. 1872).

Opinion

DaNFORTH, J.

It is a -well-settled principle that the laws of other States can be recognized by our courts only when proved as a matter of fact. In the absence of such proof the law will be assumed to be the same as our own.

The attorney who recovered the original judgment in the action at bar, testifies that he had a lien thereon for his costs.

[140]*140This lien could not be defeated by a payment to and discharge by the plaintiff in the suit. Newbert v. Cunningham, 50 Maine, 231.

The ruling of the presiding justice was in accordance with the law of this State, and no testimony was offered to show that any different rule prevailed in Massachusetts.

Exceptions overruled.

' ApflbtoN, C. J.; Cutting, WaltoN, and B ARROWS, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maloney v. Winston Bros.
111 P. 1080 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)
Peterson v. Struby
56 N.E. 733 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Me. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-wardwell-me-1872.