McKenzie v. Baugh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6733

DEWAYNE MCKENZIE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHERRIE BAUGH, Solicitor; RICK JONES, Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00315-RBH)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: August 1, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewayne McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

McKenzie’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No.

2:06-cv-00315-RBH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -