McKenzie v. Baugh

Fourth Circuit

McKenzie v. Baugh

235 F. App'x 111

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2007·No. No. 07-6733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKenzie’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No. 2:06-cv-00315-RBH, 2007 WL 1290353 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [112]*112the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne McKenzie appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McKenzie’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKenzie v. Baugh, No. 2:06-cv-00315-RBH, 2007 WL 1290353 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [112]*112the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McKenzie v. Baugh, 235 F. App'x 111 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 111 (McKenzie v. Baugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related