McKenna v. Harrington Co.
126 A. 532, 96 N.J. Eq. 700, 11 Stock. 700, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 406
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons •stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chan•cellor Fielder.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kay'S—15.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKenna v. Harrington Co., 126 A. 532, 96 N.J. Eq. 700, 11 Stock. 700, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 406 (N.J. 1924).
126 A. 532 (McKenna v. Harrington Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roland-Leopoid v. Khoury
700 A.2d 910 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Is Smick Lumber v. Hubschmidt
425 A.2d 709 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
Jersey City v. Division of Tax Appeals
69 A.2d 331 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Shoshoni Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
24 P.2d 690 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1933)