MCKELLER v. WARDEN

District Court, S.D. Indiana·Decided January 19, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-02112·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

CALVIN MCKELLER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 1:19-cv-02112-JPH-MJD ) WARDEN, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS The petitioner Calvin McKeller seeks leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate fees of $505.00. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915 must be judged by an objective, not a subjective, standard. See id. Mr. Keller's petition for writ of habeas corpus raised two grounds for relief: 1) that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to object to a faulty accomplice liability jury instruction, and 2) that his admission that he was a habitual offender was not made voluntarily, knowingly, or intelligently. The Court denied Mr. Keller's first ground for relief because the Indiana Court of Appeals reasonably applied Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), when it determined that Mr. McKeller was not prejudiced by his counsel's error because the evidence against him—including testimony from the victim that Mr. McKeller participated in the robbery—was strong. The Court denied his second ground for relief because there is no clearly established federal law that habitual offender admissions are guilty pleas to which Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969), applies. At this time, there is no objectively reasonable argument Mr. McKeller could present to argue that the disposition of his petition was erroneous. Furthermore, his motion does not identify any issues for appeal. Dkt. 26 at 1. In pursuing an appeal, therefore, the petitioner "is acting in bad faith . . . [because] to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim, which is to say a claim that no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit." Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and for this reason his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, dkt. [26], is denied. SO ORDERED. Date: 1/19/2022

Slam ruck lbanlove James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana Distribution: CALVIN MCKELLER 989262 WABASH VALLEY - CF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels 6908 S. Old US Hwy 41 P.O. Box 1111 CARLISLE, IN 47838 Jesse R. Drum INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL jesse.drum @ atg.in.gov

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MCKELLER v. WARDEN, (S.D. Ind. 2022).

MCKELLER v. WARDEN (MCKELLER v. WARDEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Minghao Lee v. William J. Clinton
209 F.3d 1025 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)