McIntyre v. Smathers
This text of 118 A.D. 776 (McIntyre v. Smathers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the complaint sets out an action on contract then the counterclaim may be litigated in this action .under- subdivision 2. of section .501 of the Code. If, on the contrary, it is in tort the judgment must be reversed. The complaint alleges the title to the personal property in the plaintiff under a promise by defendant to deliver it upon demand. Demand was made and refused. It is clearly a case where possession by the defendant until demand made was rightful, but the detention after demand is wrongful, and it amounted to a conversion át the election of the plaintiff. The title to the personal property in question is placed in the plaintiff by the allegations of the complaint, with the right of possession upon demand. It must be apparent that a refusal to surrender possession as an incident to the title constituted conversion.
[777]*777The interlocutory judgment should he reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend within twenty days after entry of order and payment of costs.
Patterson, P. J., McLaughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to defendant to amend on payment of costs in this court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 A.D. 776, 103 N.Y.S. 873, 39 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 243, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintyre-v-smathers-nyappdiv-1907.