Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.
225 A.D. 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1929·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint is at least sufficient as a cause of action in equity to recover the stock demanded or its value. (Western Railroad Co. v. Bayne, 75 N. Y. 1.) The second cause of action is sufficient as one in conversion. (McIntyre v. Smothers, 118 App. Div. 776.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 225 A.D. 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
225 A.D. 897 (Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Western Railroad Co. v. . Bayne
75 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
McIntyre v. Smathers
118 A.D. 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)