Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.

225 A.D. 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D. 897 (Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottesman v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 225 A.D. 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint is at least sufficient as a cause of action in equity to recover the stock demanded or its value. (Western Railroad Co. v. Bayne, 75 N. Y. 1.) The second cause of action is sufficient as one in conversion. (McIntyre v. Smothers, 118 App. Div. 776.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint is at least sufficient as a cause of action in equity to recover the stock demanded or its value. (Western Railroad Co. v. Bayne, 75 N. Y. 1.) The second cause of action is sufficient as one in conversion. (McIntyre v. Smothers, 118 App. Div. 776.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 A.D. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottesman-v-bank-of-new-york-trust-co-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack