McINTOSH v. McINTOSH

983 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 2511727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McINTOSH v. McINTOSH. Read the opinion of the Court — 915 So. 2d 742
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2008·No. 3D07-2202·Published

Opinion

983 So.2d 1245 (2008)

Dionne McINTOSH, Appellant,
v.
James A. McINTOSH, Appellee.

No. 3D07-2202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 25, 2008.

Catherine A. Riggins, for appellant.

Leonardo Renaud, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McINTOSH v. McINTOSH, 983 So. 2d 1245, 2008 WL 2511727 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

983 So. 2d 1245 (McINTOSH v. McINTOSH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)