McIntosh v. McIntosh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McIntosh v. McIntosh

925 So. 2d 437, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, 2006 WL 888172

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McIntosh v. McIntosh. Read the opinion of the Court — 915 So. 2d 742 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2006·No. No. 5D05-2525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment order determining the amount of attorneys’ fees to be awarded to the appellee as a result of legal fees incurred in defending the appellant’s supplemental petition for modification of alimony and child support.

We conclude that the above order must be vacated due to our recent decision in [438]*438McIntosh v. McIntosh, 915 So.2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), where we specifically vacated attorney fee awards involved in the modification proceeding.

AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES REVERSED AND VACATED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment order determining the amount of attorneys’ fees to be awarded to the appellee as a result of legal fees incurred in defending the appellant’s supplemental petition for modification of alimony and child support.

We conclude that the above order must be vacated due to our recent decision in [438]*438McIntosh v. McIntosh, 915 So.2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), where we specifically vacated attorney fee awards involved in the modification proceeding.

AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES REVERSED AND VACATED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

McIntosh v. McIntosh, 925 So. 2d 437, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, 2006 WL 888172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

925 So. 2d 437 (McIntosh v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related