McIntosh v. McIntosh

925 So. 2d 437, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, 2006 WL 888172
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 2006
DocketNo. 5D05-2525
StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 437 (McIntosh v. McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McIntosh v. McIntosh, 925 So. 2d 437, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, 2006 WL 888172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-judgment order determining the amount of attorneys’ fees to be awarded to the appellee as a result of legal fees incurred in defending the appellant’s supplemental petition for modification of alimony and child support.

We conclude that the above order must be vacated due to our recent decision in [438]*438McIntosh v. McIntosh, 915 So.2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), where we specifically vacated attorney fee awards involved in the modification proceeding.

AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES REVERSED AND VACATED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McIntosh v. McINTOSH
915 So. 2d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 So. 2d 437, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, 2006 WL 888172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcintosh-v-mcintosh-fladistctapp-2006.