McIntosh Ready Mix Concrete Corp. v. R. D. Battaglini Corp.
36 A.D.2d 561, 317 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 20, 1971·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[563]*563Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur; Herlihy, P. J., concurs in the following memorandum: I concur for affirmance, but solely upon what I consider to be the rationale of the trial court’s decision to wit: that after making certain findings of a violation of the requirements of the ASTM C-31 test, the court concluded “it is not just or equitable to penalize the general contractor or the plaintiff, McIntosh, under the present circumstances.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McIntosh Ready Mix Concrete Corp. v. R. D. Battaglini Corp., 36 A.D.2d 561, 317 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).
36 A.D.2d 561 (McIntosh Ready Mix Concrete Corp. v. R. D. Battaglini Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cross & Cross Properties, Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Everett Allied Company, Cross-Appellee
886 F.2d 497 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Bestway Construction, Inc. v. Broome County
107 A.D.2d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Rochester Plumbing Supply Co. v. A. Burgart, Inc.
49 A.D.2d 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)