McIntire v. Carr

59 N.H. 207
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

According to the practice in this state, a p'arty who is aggrieved by a judgment rendered at the trial term, may at a subsequent term move to bring the action forward, and to vacate or modify the judgment. The remedy thus afforded is simple, expeditious, mexpensive, and, in general, ample. A resort to the cumbersome process of a writ of error is seldom necessary. In this case, if the plaintiff is entitled to any relief, he can have it on a motion to bring the original action forward at the trial term; and for that reason the writ of error is

Dismissed.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McIntire v. Carr, 59 N.H. 207 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 207 (McIntire v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbot v. Renaud
5 A. 659 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886)