Abbot v. Renaud

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Abbot v. Renaud

5 A. 659, 64 N.H. 89

DecidedJune 5, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A. 659 (Abbot v. Renaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbot v. Renaud, 5 A. 659, 64 N.H. 89 (N.H. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen, J.

Ordinarily a party aggrieved by error in a judgment has a simple and ample remedy by motion at the trial term to bring the action forward, and to vacate, modify, or reverse the judgment complained of. McIntire v. Carr, 59 N. H. 207. If it shall appear that there is any record of an order or judgment made in court substituting Renaud as party plaintiff in the place of Wilbur in the action Wilbur v. Abbot, the plaintiff in error can have his remedy at the trial term, the cumbersome process of a writ of error being unnecessary.

Writ dismissed.

Doe, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen, J.

Ordinarily a party aggrieved by error in a judgment has a simple and ample remedy by motion at the trial term to bring the action forward, and to vacate, modify, or reverse the judgment complained of. McIntire v. Carr, 59 N. H. 207. If it shall appear that there is any record of an order or judgment made in court substituting Renaud as party plaintiff in the place of Wilbur in the action Wilbur v. Abbot, the plaintiff in error can have his remedy at the trial term, the cumbersome process of a writ of error being unnecessary.

Writ dismissed.

Doe, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A. 659, 64 N.H. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbot-v-renaud-nh-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack