McInnis v. State

643 So. 2d 119, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9813, 1994 WL 551495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McInnis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 642 So. 2d 831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 1994·No. No. 94-2062·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal follows from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. In response to this court’s order to show cause, the state has conceded that the trial court erred when it summarily denied appellant’s motion. We accept the state’s concession and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment to an order those portions of the record demonstrating that appellant is not entitled to relief. See Hiler v. State, 634 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McInnis v. State, 643 So. 2d 119, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9813, 1994 WL 551495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 119 (McInnis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hiler v. State
634 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)