McHugh v. McHugh

752 So. 2d 1285, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 2000 WL 290086
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McHugh v. McHugh. Read the opinion of the Court — 702 So. 2d 639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 21, 2000·No. No. 1D99-1261·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant J. Michael McHugh appeals the trial court’s decisions to award primary residential custody of the parties’ two minor children to appellee Anita M. McHugh, and to not require appellee to pay taxes and- insurance on property owned by the parties as tenants by the entireties during their marriage. We find that the record provided to this court is inadequate to support appellant’s claim that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding appellee primary residential custody. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). We further conclude that the second issue is without merit. See Taber v. Taber, 626 So.2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Tinsley v. Tinsley, 490 So.2d 205, 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (mutual obligation to pay charges placed upon property applies to property held as tenants in common, as opposed to tenants by the entireties, wherein either party may be held accountable for the charges).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McHugh v. McHugh, 752 So. 2d 1285, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 2000 WL 290086 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 1285 (McHugh v. McHugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Taber v. Taber
626 So. 2d 1089 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Tinsley v. Tinsley
490 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)