McHugh v. McHugh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McHugh v. McHugh

819 So. 2d 947, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8775, 2002 WL 1369855

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3202

StatusPublished

This text of 819 So. 2d 947 (McHugh v. McHugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McHugh v. McHugh, 819 So. 2d 947, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8775, 2002 WL 1369855 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the postjudgment order striking appellant’s claim for attorney’s fees on the ground that appellee litigated in bad faith. Appellant made no request for fees prior to final judgment, and the trial court did not reserve jurisdiction to award fees in the final judgment. See Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 622 So.2d 559, 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So.2d 519, 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the postjudgment order striking appellant’s claim for attorney’s fees on the ground that appellee litigated in bad faith. Appellant made no request for fees prior to final judgment, and the trial court did not reserve jurisdiction to award fees in the final judgment. See Conley v. Shutts & Bowen, P.A., 622 So.2d 559, 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Cibula v. Cibula, 578 So.2d 519, 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

819 So. 2d 947, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8775, 2002 WL 1369855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchugh-v-mchugh-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack