McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.

249 A.D.2d 110, 670 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 16, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 110 (McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc., 249 A.D.2d 110, 670 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about June 5, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant’s request for further depositions and, in part, for a further bill of particulars, unanimously dismissed, with costs payble to plaintiff, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The subject preliminary conference order is nonappealable (Bork v City of New York, 237 AD2d 218). Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm the denial of the depositions appellant seeks for the reasons stated by the conference court, and affirm the denial of the further bill of particulars appellant seeks, since the matters sought have already been furnished in the original complaint against the other defendants. We have considered appellant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

al-Cantara v. Tausend
47 A.D.3d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 110, 670 N.Y.S.2d 111, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mchenry-v-1020-park-ave-inc-nyappdiv-1998.