al-Cantara v. Tausend

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

al-Cantara v. Tausend

47 A.D.3d 465, 848 N.Y.S.2d 877

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 2008·Published

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered August 10, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, deemed certain discovery responses by defendants to be sufficient, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The preliminary conference order at issue is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made upon notice (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see Castadot v Palmer, 266 AD2d 169 [1999]; McHenry v 1020 Park Ave., 249 AD2d 110 [1998]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal in light of the inadequate record before this Court. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered August 10, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, deemed certain discovery responses by defendants to be sufficient, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The preliminary conference order at issue is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made upon notice (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see Castadot v Palmer, 266 AD2d 169 [1999]; McHenry v 1020 Park Ave., 249 AD2d 110 [1998]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal in light of the inadequate record before this Court. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

al-Cantara v. Tausend, 47 A.D.3d 465, 848 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

47 A.D.3d 465 (al-Cantara v. Tausend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related