al-Cantara v. Tausend

47 A.D.3d 465, 848 N.Y.S.2d 877

This text of 47 A.D.3d 465 (al-Cantara v. Tausend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
al-Cantara v. Tausend, 47 A.D.3d 465, 848 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered August 10, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, deemed certain discovery responses by defendants to be sufficient, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

The preliminary conference order at issue is not appealable as of right because it does not decide a motion made upon notice (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; see Castadot v Palmer, 266 AD2d 169 [1999]; McHenry v 1020 Park Ave., 249 AD2d 110 [1998]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal in light of the inadequate record before this Court. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McHenry v. 1020 Park Ave., Inc.
249 A.D.2d 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Castadot v. Palmer
266 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.3d 465, 848 N.Y.S.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-cantara-v-tausend-nyappdiv-2008.