McGuire v. FLORIDA LOTTERY

17 So. 3d 1276, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14494, 2009 WL 3110153
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 2009·No. 1D09-3137·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant George McGuire brought a civil complaint for damages against various defendants. The trial court granted motions to dismiss filed by some of the defendants, reciting that “[t]his dismissal is without prejudice. The Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before April 8, 2009. If no such amended complaint is filed, the case will stand dismissed *1277 as to the Defendants [who moved to dismiss].” McGuire appealed, although his notice of appeal does not appear to be timely.

We do not reach the issue of timeliness because the trial court has not issued a final or otherwise appealable order. An order which dismisses a complaint with leave to amend is not final. Eagle v. Eagle, 632 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The provision in the order that it will become final at a future date if the complaint is not amended does not cure this defect; a separate final order must be entered. Ponton v. Gross, 576 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

This appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGuire v. FLORIDA LOTTERY, 17 So. 3d 1276, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14494, 2009 WL 3110153 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

17 So. 3d 1276 (McGuire v. FLORIDA LOTTERY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony Joseph Farina v. State of Florida
191 So. 3d 454 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Pullins v. Garcia
170 So. 3d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Heekin v. Highsmith
56 So. 3d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)