Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Heekin v. Highsmith

Heekin v. Highsmith

56 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17444, 2010 WL 4595667
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2010·No. No. 1D10-5320·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See McGuire v. Florida Lottery, 17 So.3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (order dismissing complaint with leave to amend is not final despite provision that it will become final at a future date if complaint is not amended; a separate final order must be entered).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heekin v. Highsmith, 56 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17444, 2010 WL 4595667 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

56 So. 3d 786 (Heekin v. Highsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGuire v. FLORIDA LOTTERY
17 So. 3d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)