Heekin v. Highsmith

56 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17444, 2010 WL 4595667
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-5320
StatusPublished

This text of 56 So. 3d 786 (Heekin v. Highsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heekin v. Highsmith, 56 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17444, 2010 WL 4595667 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See McGuire v. Florida Lottery, 17 So.3d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (order dismissing complaint with leave to amend is not final despite provision that it will become final at a future date if complaint is not amended; a separate final order must be entered).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGuire v. FLORIDA LOTTERY
17 So. 3d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 So. 3d 786, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17444, 2010 WL 4595667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heekin-v-highsmith-fladistctapp-2010.