McGuire v. Commonwealth

70 U.S. 387, 18 L. Ed. 226, 3 Wall. 387, 1865 U.S. LEXIS 722
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 1, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 70 U.S. 387 (McGuire v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGuire v. Commonwealth, 70 U.S. 387, 18 L. Ed. 226, 3 Wall. 387, 1865 U.S. LEXIS 722 (1865).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court below decided that the license received under the act of Congress gave to the defendant no right to keep or sell intoxicating liquors in violation of the State law.

Whatever, might be the effect of this license as to the rights under it, in the absence of other provisions of the act of Congress — a question not involved in the case, and, therefore,.not material to be noticed — it is quite clear that it conferred no right or authority on the defendant below, and hence furnished no defence to the indictment under the law of the State.

The 67th section of the act of Congress enacts, “that no license hereinbefore provided for, if granted, shall be construed to authorize the commencement or continuation of any trade, business, occupation, or employment therein mentioned, within any State or Territory of the United States in which it is or shall be specially prohibited by the laws thereof, or in violation of the laws of any State or Territory.”

In view of this provision, it is in vain to attempt to give force or effect to the license against the State law; and hence the authority derived from it, upon which the defendant relied for his defence in the court below, fails.

The decision was against an authority set up under an act of Congress, and the case is, therefore, rightfully here under *396 the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. But as we are of opinion the decision of the court below was right, the judgment must be affirmed.

[See the preceding case.—Rep.]

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wylie v. State Board of Equalization
21 F. Supp. 604 (S.D. California, 1937)
City of Atlanta v. Stokes
165 S.E. 270 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
State ex rel. Southwell v. Zangerle
14 Ohio App. 99 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1921)
United States v. Sandoval
198 F. 539 (D. New Mexico, 1912)
Reider v. Davis
10 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 177 (Scioto County Court of Common Pleas, 1910)
Schlesinger v. . Gilhooly
81 N.E. 619 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
Matter of Heff
197 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Hodge v. Muscatine County
196 U.S. 276 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Snyder v. Bettman
190 U.S. 249 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Endleman v. United States
86 F. 456 (Ninth Circuit, 1898)
Territory of Dakota ex rel. McMahon v. O'Connor
41 N.W. 746 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1889)
State v. Newton
14 A. 604 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1888)
Royall v. Virginia
116 U.S. 572 (Supreme Court, 1886)
State ex rel. Sage v. Bennett
19 Neb. 191 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1886)
Standard Oil Co. v. Combs
96 Ind. 179 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Edye v. Robertson
18 F. 135 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York, 1883)
State v. Lillard
78 Mo. 136 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
In re Watson
15 F. 511 (D. Vermont, 1882)
Youngblood v. Sexton
32 Mich. 406 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 U.S. 387, 18 L. Ed. 226, 3 Wall. 387, 1865 U.S. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-commonwealth-scotus-1865.