McGriff v. Bratton

293 A.D.2d 401, 740 N.Y.S.2d 342
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 293 A.D.2d 401 (McGriff v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGriff v. Bratton, 293 A.D.2d 401, 740 N.Y.S.2d 342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered August 31, 1999, which granted respondent Police Commissioner’s motion to dismiss petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) application to compel it to produce certain information pertaining to petitioner’s arrest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[402]*402We reject petitioner’s argument that although the information he sought in his second FOIL request was also sought in his first request, the second, more detailed request was justified by respondent’s denial of the first request as too broad to permit a search. Upon denial of the first request as too broad to permit a search, petitioner, in order to preserve his right to judicial review, was required to exhaust his administrative remedies by filing an administrative appeal within 30 days (Public Officers Law § 89 [4] [a], [b]). Belated judicial review of that denial cannot be based on petitioner’s second request for the same information, albeit more detailed (see, Matter of Corbin v Ward, 160 AD2d 596, lv denied 76 NY2d 706; Matter of Van Steenburg v Thomas, 242 AD2d 802, lv denied 91 NY2d 803; cf., Matter of Sanders v Bratton, 258 AD2d 422). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mingo v. Records Access Officer of the N.Y. County Dist. Attorney's Off.
2024 NY Slip Op 05030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Bradhurst Site Constr. Corp. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals
128 A.D.3d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Doe v. Lake Grove School
107 A.D.3d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Advocates for Children of New York, Inc. v. New York City Department of Education
101 A.D.3d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Brander v. Town of Warren
18 Misc. 3d 477 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Moreno v. New York County District Attorney's Office
38 A.D.3d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Jamison v. Tesler
300 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
293 A.D.2d 401, 740 N.Y.S.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgriff-v-bratton-nyappdiv-2002.