McGraw v. Power

New York Court of Appeals

McGraw v. Power

122 N.E.2d 103, 307 N.Y. 824

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 10, 1954

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 N.E.2d 103 (McGraw v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McGraw v. Power, 122 N.E.2d 103, 307 N.Y. 824 (N.Y. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

307 N.Y. 824 (1954)

In the Matter of William J. McGraw et al., Appellants and Respondents,
v.
James M. Power et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Thomas V. La Fauci et al., Respondents and Appellants.
In the Matter of Henry J. Latham et al., Appellants and Respondents,
v.
James M. Power et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Robert Rose et al., Respondents and Appellants.
In the Matter of Walter G. McGahan et al., Appellants and Respondents,
v.
James M. Power et al., Constituting The Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Leon A. Beerman et al., Respondents and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued September 10, 1954. Decided September 10, 1954

George W. Herz and Arthur G. Warner for appellants-respondents.

Benjamin Gassman, Isidore Levine, Benjamin S. Rosenthal, John F. X. Browne, Joseph Danahy and Thomas A. Duffy for respondents-appellants.

Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel (Robert E. Hugh, Seymour B. Quel and Thomas W. A. Crowe of counsel), for respondents.

Concur: LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI