McGrath v. Blumenthal
This text of 220 A.D. 781 (McGrath v. Blumenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order vacating examination of defendant Rudolph Blumenthal before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The fact, if it be a fact, that plaintiff already has knowledge of the matters sought to be elicited by the examination of said defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (Istok v. Senderling, 118 App. Div. 162; Terry v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co., 180 id. 714; Pierce v. Morris, 192 id. 502; Richards v. Whiting, 127 id. 208.) Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty," JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcgrath-v-blumenthal-nyappdiv-1927.