Comiskey v. Cross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Comiskey v. Cross

224 A.D. 759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 A.D. 759 (Comiskey v. Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comiskey v. Cross, 224 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff’s knowledge of matters sought to be elicited by the examination of defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (McGrath v. Blumenthal, 220 App. Div. 781; Shul Tan Realty Corporation v. Coney [760]*760Island Estates, Inc., 223 id. 772.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff’s knowledge of matters sought to be elicited by the examination of defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (McGrath v. Blumenthal, 220 App. Div. 781; Shul Tan Realty Corporation v. Coney [760]*760Island Estates, Inc., 223 id. 772.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comiskey-v-cross-nyappdiv-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack