Comiskey v. Cross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Comiskey v. Cross

224 A.D. 759

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff’s knowledge of matters sought to be elicited by the examination of defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (McGrath v. Blumenthal, 220 App. Div. 781; Shul Tan Realty Corporation v. Coney [760] Island Estates, Inc., 223 id. 772.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff’s knowledge of matters sought to be elicited by the examination of defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (McGrath v. Blumenthal, 220 App. Div. 781; Shul Tan Realty Corporation v. Coney [760] Island Estates, Inc., 223 id. 772.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.

Comiskey v. Cross, 224 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

224 A.D. 759 (Comiskey v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related