McGlothen v. Department of Revenue
This text of McGlothen v. Department of Revenue (McGlothen v. Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
MELVIN P. MCGLOTHEN ) and GAIL L. MCGLOTHEN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) TC-MD 120681C ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ) State of Oregon, ) ) Defendant. ) DECISION OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed August 2, 2012,
requesting that the Complaint be dismissed.
This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. Plaintiffs’ filed their Complaint on July 10, 2012, requesting relief from penalties,
interest, and tax deficiency amounts for tax years 2002 through 2005, 2008, and 2009.
Defendant filed its Answer on August 2, 2012. The parties appeared for a telephone hearing on
August 22, 2012, to discuss Plaintiff’s appeal.
Plaintiffs’ tax liability was self-assessed. (Def’s Ans at 1.) Plaintiffs do not challenge
the tax assessed, but state that they “cannot pay anything” on the amount due. (Ptfs’ Compl
at 1.) Penalties were assessed because Plaintiffs failed to file for three consecutive years, among
other reasons. (Def’s Ans at 1.) Defendant requests that the penalties and interest be upheld, as
“[the court] lacks authority to waive penalties and interest * * *.” (Id. at 2.)
ORS 305.145 (2011)1 grants the Department of Revenue the authority to adjust penalty
and interest amounts. The court is without “legal authority to consider requests for discretionary
1 The applicable provisions have not been significantly amended during the time period before the court.
DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 120681C 1 waiver of interest.” Schiavone v. Dept. or Rev., TC-MD No 101296C at 2 (March 1, 2011);
ORS 305.560 (1)(a) (2011); see also Pelett v. Dept. of Rev. 11 OTR 364 (1990). Because the
court lacks jurisdiction with respect to penalties and interest, and because Plaintiffs’ do not
challenge the tax assessed, the court finds that Defendant’s motion should be granted. Now,
therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.
Dated this day of August 2012.
JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.
Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed.
This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner on August 29, 2012. The Court filed and entered this document on August 29, 2012.
DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 120681C 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McGlothen v. Department of Revenue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcglothen-v-department-of-revenue-ortc-2012.