McGee v. Anderson
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN D. MCGEE, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:24-CV-00013 SPM DONNA ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 9]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 5 & 6; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 9] is DENIED. Dated this 18" day of January, 2024.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGee v. Anderson (McGee v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.