McGeary v. McGeary
3 A. 22, 1 Sadler 297, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 590
Opinion
The evidence to prove the execution of the will by Abbott L. McGeary was most ample to submit to the jury. Whether the devisee was the wife or the mistress, the testator had a legal right to devise his property to her. The evidence of the marriage was, however, so positive that it could not be taken from the jury. The credibility of the witness was for the jury, and was properly submitted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McGeary v. McGeary, 3 A. 22, 1 Sadler 297, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 590 (Pa. 1886).
3 A. 22 (McGeary v. McGeary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Tunaboat Association v. Ross
District of Columbia, 2019
Am. Tunaboat Ass'n v. Ross
391 F. Supp. 3d 98 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Bonner v. Astrue
725 F. Supp. 2d 898 (C.D. California, 2010)
Us Ex Rel. Edwin P. Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, United States of America, Amicus Supporting Us Ex Rel. Edwin P. Harrison v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, United States of America, Amicus Supporting
352 F.3d 908 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
At&T Communications Of New Jersey, Inc. v. Verizon New Jersey, Inc.
270 F.3d 162 (Third Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Richard E. Tapert
993 F.2d 1548 (Sixth Circuit, 1993)
Fleming's Estate
109 A. 265 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)