McFATRICH v. McFATRICH

211 S.W.3d 672, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 2007 WL 152127
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 23, 2007
DocketWD 66628
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 S.W.3d 672 (McFATRICH v. McFATRICH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McFATRICH v. McFATRICH, 211 S.W.3d 672, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 2007 WL 152127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In an action for dissolution, Kevin McFatrich (“Father”) appeals the denial of his motion for relief from default judgment pursuant to Rule 74.06(b). The trial court awarded Mother (“Mother”) sole custody of the minor child and granted Father supervised visitation. Father challenges only the supervised visitation. Father claims the trial court erred in granting supervised visitation in the default judgment where Mother’s petition asked that Father receive reasonable visitation. He additionally claims that the trial court erred in denying his Rule 74.06(b). Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawkins v. PLANNED INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION AUTHORITY
211 S.W.3d 672 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W.3d 672, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 110, 2007 WL 152127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfatrich-v-mcfatrich-moctapp-2007.