Hawkins v. PLANNED INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION AUTHORITY
211 S.W.3d 672, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 108
Opinion
ORDER
Alexander and Michael Hawkins appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment upon the joint motion of the Planned Industrial Expansion Authority and Ger-shon Investments, L.P. The Hawkins brought suit for inverse condemnation of their property, unjust enrichment, and rescission against the PIEA and Gershon after a trial court confirmed the commissioners’ award in an eminent domain action. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. PLANNED INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION AUTHORITY, 211 S.W.3d 672, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 108 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
211 S.W.3d 672 (Hawkins v. PLANNED INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION AUTHORITY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McFATRICH v. McFATRICH
211 S.W.3d 672 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)