McEwen v. Gibbs
This text of 4 U.S. 119 (McEwen v. Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case, on a parol acceptance of a bill of exchange. The plaintiff having become a certificated bankrupt, was called as a witness to prove the acceptance. Dallas objected to his competency, on the ground of the witness’s liability for costs; and his interest in augmenting the estate surrendered under his commission.
But it appearing, that the assignees carried on the suit, and had entered into security for costs, The Court (after the plaintiff had released his interest at the bar) directed him to be sworn, upon the authority of Scott v. McClenachan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 U.S. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcewen-v-gibbs-pa-1794.