McEwan v. City of New York
279 A.D. 802, 109 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 21, 1952·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
The petitioner failed to give any explanation for the delay in applying to the court after consultation with his attorney. (Matter of De Crescenzo v. City of New York, 274 App.-Div. 889; Matter of Blank v. City of New York, 273 App. Div. 812.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McEwan v. City of New York, 279 A.D. 802, 109 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 802 (McEwan v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jagacki v. Board of Education
34 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Gipp v. Board of Education
20 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Fleming v. City of New York
21 Misc. 2d 540 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Miller v. New York City Housing Authority
7 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Golden v. New York City Transit Authority
4 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Christian v. Village of Herkimer
208 Misc. 814 (New York County Courts, 1955)
Babinsky v. City of New York
279 A.D. 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)