McDowell v. State

275 S.W. 1117, 101 Tex. Crim. 569, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDowell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Tex. Crim. 512
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 1925·No. No. 9755.·Published

Opinion

BAKER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the' Criminal District Court of Dallas County for unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor and his punishment assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception and shows that the indictment correctly charges the offense and the Court in his charge properly applied the law relative thereto. There being no error shown in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. State, 275 S.W. 1117, 101 Tex. Crim. 569, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 917 (Tex. 1925).

275 S.W. 1117 (McDowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.