McDowell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McDowell v. State

272 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 250, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 423

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDowell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Tex. Crim. 512 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 1925·No. No. 9287.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction in Criminal District Court No. 2. of Dallas county for driving an automobile while intoxicated; punishment, thirty days in county jail.

The record appears before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Several special charges appear but same are free of notation showing facts necessary to call for their consideration, and their refusal is not complained of in separate bill of exceptions.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction in Criminal District Court No. 2. of Dallas county for driving an automobile while intoxicated; punishment, thirty days in county jail.

The record appears before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. Several special charges appear but same are free of notation showing facts necessary to call for their consideration, and their refusal is not complained of in separate bill of exceptions.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

McDowell v. State, 272 S.W. 1117, 100 Tex. Crim. 250, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 423 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

272 S.W. 1117 (McDowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.