McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2007·No. 18-4710·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1301

CHESTER LEE MCDOWELL, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; CHARLES BARRETT, IRS Agent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00022-FL)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 27, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chester Lee McDowell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Joan Iris Oppenheimer, Patricia McDonald Bowman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chester Lee McDowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s

order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing his

complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Internal Revenue

Service, No. 2:06-CV-00022-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2007). We also

deny the Government’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service, (4th Cir. 2007).

McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service (McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.