McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service

Fourth Circuit

McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service

231 F. App'x 261

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2007·No. No. 07-1301·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lee McDowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 2:06-CV-00022-FL, 2007 WL 1703517 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2007). We also deny the Government’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lee McDowell, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 2:06-CV-00022-FL, 2007 WL 1703517 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2007). We also deny the Government’s motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service, 231 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

231 F. App'x 261 (McDowell v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.