McDowell v. Calderon

116 F.3d 364, 1997 WL 356937
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1997·No. No. 96-99000·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Opinion by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TROTT.

Prior Report: For Majority Opinion, see 107 F.3d 1351.

[365] ORDER

The opinion filed February 26, 1997 and published at 107 F.3d 1351 is amended by deleting Judge Trott as concurring in the majority opinion, and by adding to the majority opinion Judge Trott’s concurring and dissenting opinion filed herewith.

With this amendment, Judges Wiggins and Thompson have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thompson has -voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wiggins recommends rejection. Judge Trott has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is being circulated to the entire court. An order accepting or rejecting that suggestion will be entered in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. Calderon, 116 F.3d 364, 1997 WL 356937 (9th Cir. 1997).

116 F.3d 364 (McDowell v. Calderon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pepin
514 F.3d 193 (Second Circuit, 2008)
Crock v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
261 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (S.D. Iowa, 2003)
Odle v. Calderon
65 F. Supp. 2d 1065 (N.D. California, 1999)
McDowell v. Calderon
116 F.3d 364 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)