McDowell v. Calderon

Ninth Circuit

McDowell v. Calderon

116 F.3d 364, 1997 WL 356937

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1997

DocketNo. 96-99000

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 116 F.3d 364 (McDowell v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDowell v. Calderon, 116 F.3d 364, 1997 WL 356937 (9th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TROTT.

Prior Report: For Majority Opinion, see 107 F.3d 1351.

[365]*365ORDER

The opinion filed February 26, 1997 and published at 107 F.3d 1351 is amended by deleting Judge Trott as concurring in the majority opinion, and by adding to the majority opinion Judge Trott’s concurring and dissenting opinion filed herewith.

With this amendment, Judges Wiggins and Thompson have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Thompson has -voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wiggins recommends rejection. Judge Trott has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc is being circulated to the entire court. An order accepting or rejecting that suggestion will be entered in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI