McDonough v. First National Bank

34 Tex. 309
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 34 Tex. 309 (McDonough v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonough v. First National Bank, 34 Tex. 309 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Walker, J.

The paper writing signed by J. S. Roberts, “ Com. missioner First National Bank, Houston,” and dated January 20, 1866, is not the contract of the First National Bank of Houston) unless the bank made it so by its' approval -and adoption, after its organization under the laws of the United States.

It may be that J. S. Roberts is individually liable to the plaintiff for the money he claims from the bank; but, not being called on so to do, we shall offer no opinion upon that question.

The plaintiff avers a consideration moving to the bank, and that the bank, after its organization, appropriated the benefits of his labor, money and influence. That it adopted and confirmed Roberts’s action, making that action its own.'

If this be true the bank is liable, and the question presented should have been submitted to a jury.

[331]*331The court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition; upon the question of fact presented in the pleadings the liability of the bank depends»

The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Tex. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonough-v-first-national-bank-tex-1871.