McDonnell v. Shalala, Sec

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 1997
Docket97-6069
StatusUnpublished

This text of McDonnell v. Shalala, Sec (McDonnell v. Shalala, Sec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonnell v. Shalala, Sec, (4th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6069

CURT MCDONNELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; BRUCE C. VLADECK, Adminis- trator of Social Security,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-96-3805-WMN)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curt McDonnell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order transferring his

action to the District of Arizona under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (1994).

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the order

is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. See Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d

925, 927 (4th Cir. 1986) (transfers under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), like

28 U.S.C. § 1404 transfers, are interlocutory and nonappealable).

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McDonnell v. Shalala, Sec, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonnell-v-shalala-sec-ca4-1997.