McDonald v. Ellis
This text of 36 P. 37 (McDonald v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A motion to dismiss tbe appeal herein was' filed by appellee for the reason that the instrument filed by appellants as a bond on appeal in said cause was not accompanied by the affidavit of each or either of the sureties thereon that he or they were worth the amount for which he or they signed the same, over and above his or their just debts and liabilities, exclusive of property exempt from execution, as is provided shall be done by paragraph 868 of the Revised Statutes of 1887. This paragraph provides that a bond on appeal “shall be of no effect unless accompanied by the affidavit of each of the sureties that he is worth the'amount, for which he has signed, over and above his just debts and liabilities exclusive of property exempt from execution.” This statute is mandatory, and, unless the statutes in relation to appeal-bonds and their justification are strictly complied with, this, court can acquire no jurisdiction on appeal. Rev. Stats. 1887, sees. 863, 868.
Dismissed.
Rouse, J., and Sloan, J., concur,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 P. 37, 4 Ariz. 189, 1894 Ariz. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-ellis-ariz-1894.