Halladay v. Hall

108 P. 479, 13 Ariz. 258, 1910 Ariz. LEXIS 93
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided April 2, 1910·No. Civil No. 1140·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This ease must be dismissed, for the reason that the sureties upon the appeal bond have not justified in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 1516 of the Revised Statutes of 1901, or at all. This statute is mandatory. This court has, therefore, acquired no jurisdiction. McDonald v. Ellis, 4 Ariz. 189, 36 Pac. 37.

The appeal is dismissed.

CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Halladay v. Hall, 108 P. 479, 13 Ariz. 258, 1910 Ariz. LEXIS 93 (Ark. 1910).

108 P. 479 (Halladay v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McBroom v. Young
132 P. 300 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1913)